Rowe v. Goldberg

435 N.W.2d 605 (1989)

Helen ROWE, Appellant,

v.

Ruth K. GOLDBERG, Respondent.

No. CX-88-1156.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 14, 1989.

Review Denied April 24, 1989.

Michael W. Unger, Hvass, Weisman & King, Chtd., Minneapolis, for appellant.

William K. Strifert, Taylor Law Firm, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and FOLEY and SCHUMACHER, JJ.

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for a new trial based on claims of evidentiary errors, the limiting of the scope of expert testimony, and the failure of the trial court…