Legal Opinion

City of Lebanon v. Schneider

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 27, 1942PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaek, J.

In May, 1942, the City of Lebanon instituted this proceeding by filing in the circuit court its petition, pursuant to Sections 3312-3316, Eevised Statutes Missouri 1939 [Mo. R. S. A., secs. 3312-16, pp. 495-497], praying for a pro forma decree authorizing the issuance of water revenue bonds in the principal sum of $200,000.00 and adjudicating the validity thereof. Notice was duly given and intervener filed his petition attacking the constitutionality of the statute under which the city is proceeding, and questioning certain provisions of Ordinance No. 1035 of the city authorizing the bonds»…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Laret Investment Co. v. DickmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Kansas City v. LiebiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  3. State Ex Rel. Carpenter v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  4. Bell v. City of FayetteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  5. Schnell v. City of Rock IslandIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fire Dist. of Lemay v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  2. City of Maryville v. CushmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Conrad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Reals v. CoursonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. City of Springfield v. MondaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API