State v. Bigley
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
November 6, 1931, appellant Bigley, Hugh Coppinger and Ben Lawley planned to burglarize a bank in Hazelton, November 9th. The state contended that Bigley proposed the scheme to Coppinger and Lawley, the defense the contrary. Aside from this conflict, without material dispute, the history of this rather unusual prosecution unfolds as follows:
Pursuant to arrangement, Bigley went in his ear, on November 7th, with the other two to Iiazelton, and reconnoitered the ban! and selected a place in the near-by countryside, where, after the burglary, they were to hide the money and their clothes worn at…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. LanzitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Minter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- State v. DeckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- State v. GrimmettIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. JesserIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. WilliamsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Wilson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- State v. FedderIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. FedderIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.