Legal Opinion

United States v. Estanislao Correa-De Jesus

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 2, 1983No. 82-1854PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Chief Judge.

Sixteen years ago, appellant Estanislao Correa-De Jesus pleaded guilty before a federal judge in the Northern District of Illinois to two counts of distributing heroin. After the judge asked De Jesus whether anyone had promised him that he would receive a certain sentence if he pleaded guilty and De Jesus answered no, the district judge sentenced him to eight years in prison. De Jesus’ attorneys moved under Rule 35 to reduce that sentence, claiming that the judge had promised them in chambers to sentence De Jesus to five years in prison if he pleaded guilty and that they…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Kwok Chee Kwan, AKA Jeff KwanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Leonard Ray Blanton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Robert Dibernardo and Theodore RothsteinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. RiedlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Korematsu v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API