Legal Opinion

People for the Ethical Operation of Prosecutors etc. v. Spitzer

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 12, 2020No. G057546Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 8/12/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL OPERATION OF PROSECUTORS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT et al., G057546 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2018-00983799) v. OPINION TODD SPITZER, as District Attorney, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Glenda Sanders, Judge; William D. Claster, Judge. Reversed. ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Peter Eliasberg, Brendan Hamme; American Civil Liberties Union…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API