Legal Opinion

F. M. Sibley Lumber Co. v. Schultz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1941No. Docket No. 2, Calendar No. 41,194PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, C. J.

This is an action in assumpsit for lumber material sold by plaintiff to defendant. Plaintiff claimed a balance due in the sum of $16,-089.37 and interest. Defendant denied liability and claimed set-off and recoupment for the sum of $24,194.32 plus interest at five per cent, from September 1, 1937. On May 26, 1939, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $14,589 and a verdict of no cause for action on defendant’s claim for set-off and recoupment. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff for the amount of the verdict.

Many facts in this case are disputed, but the following…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Switzer v. Pinconning Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Dunn Road MacHinery Co. v. Charlevoix Abstract & Engineering Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Murphy v. GiffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. John D. Gruber Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Linn v. GunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Drager v. Carlson Hybrid Corn Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  2. Salzman v. MaldaverMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Harold Murphy v. Eaton, Yale & Towne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  4. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Walter Kidde & Co., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Soderberg v. Detroit Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API