Legal Opinion
Hannon v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 18, 1994No. Nos. 91-1334C, 92-469CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
The motions currently before this court are plaintiffs’ motions for certification as a class of approximately 340 GS-1810 diversion investigators, employed by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). Plaintiffs seek recovery of overtime compensation from the United States government pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Compensations Act (“FECA”), codified in scattered sections of 5 U.S.C. (1988) and/or the Federal Law Enforcement Pay Reform Act of 1990, Pub.L. No. 101-509, tit. IV, 104 Stat. 1389, 1465, as amended by Pub.L. No. 102-378, § 3(5)-(9), 106 Stat. 1356 (“FLEPRA”). The…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Smith v. SwormstedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Quinault Allottee Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Curry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Fisher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Moore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Taylor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Berkley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.