Legal Opinion
Zolan, Bernstein, Dworken & Klein v. Milone
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 5, 1983No. (2354)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The plaintiff instituted this action to recover fees due and owing for accounting services performed at the defendants’ request. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff. From this judgment, the defendants have appealed.
The defendants’ sole claim on appeal is that the court erred in concluding that the individual defendants were liable for the debts incurred for the accounting services performed rather than the corporate entities in which the defendants were shareholders.
Between June 1, 1977, and December 31, 1978, the plaintiff, a partnership engaged in the business of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Appliances, Inc. v. YostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ehrenkranz v. EhrenkranzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Grayson v. GraysonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- State v. MenziesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Ram Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. A.B.C. Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Selby v. PelletierConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.