Hayes v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
Stating the case as made by the record most strongly in favor of the state, it is made to appear or may be inferred that the defendants were operating a chicken farm; that they were in the constructive possession thereof; that Lem Hammond, employed by them for the purpose of operating the chicken farm, lived in the only house on the place and was in the actual possession of the premises; that the officers made a raid and found .in the house occupied by Lem Hammond 31 pints of whisky, an empty keg, and some syphons, funnels, etc., and in the woods -nearby a number of empty kegs, one of which…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Baender v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- State v. DrewSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- People v. HurleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fennoy v. City of HartselleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
- Cope v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
- Duncan v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939
- Handley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
- Posten v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.