Legal Opinion · Dissent

Associated Partnership I, Inc. v. Huddleston

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1994Published

1DissentReid, Justice

I concur with the holding that, under prior decisions of this Court,1 the proceeds from *200the liquidation of the partnership interest owned by Associated Partnership, Inc. are “non-business earnings” within the meaning of the statute applicable at the time of the liquidation.

However, I would hold that the commercial domicile of the taxpayer was Tennessee and, therefore, pursuant to T.C.A. § 67-4-810, the earnings realized on the liquidation are subject to allocation to Tennessee.

The majority is guided by form rather than principle, and, as stated in Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 56…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Union Carbide Corp. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Western Natural Gas Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. McColganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Federated Stores Realty, Inc. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API