Legal Opinion

Federated Stores Realty, Inc. v. Huddleston

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1992PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*207OPINION

REID, Chief Justice.

This case presents an appeal by Federated Stores Realty, Inc. (Federated) from the judgment of the Chancery Court of Davidson County denying Federated’s request for refund of corporate franchise and excise taxes for its four fiscal years ending January 31, 1984 through 1987, the assessment period.

I

Federated is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Cincinnati, Ohio. During the assessment period and at all times relevant to the issues in this case, it was engaged in the business of developing, leasing, and managing real estate in various parts…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Western Natural Gas Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. McVean & Barlow, Inc. v. New Mexico Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Holiday Inns, Inc. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Garland v. Seaboard Coastline RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  5. District of Columbia v. Pierce Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Union Carbide Corp. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Polaroid Corp. v. OffermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Messer Griesheim Industries, Inc. v. Cryotech of Kingsport, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  4. Messer Griesheim Industries, Inc. v. Cryotech of Kingsport, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  5. Kinnard v. Shoney's, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API