Legal Opinion
Krauss v. Dinerstein
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided March 10, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichard S. Lane, J.
This action tried before me without a jury illustrates interesting aspects of the interrelationship of the repealed Stock Corporation Law, the new Business Corporation Law, and the continuing Debtor and Creditor Law. The facts are substantially uncontroverted.
The individual defendants were the sole officers and directors and defendant, Ben Dinerstein, was the sole stockholder of Bendyne Products, Inc., a corporation formed to market a *683deodorizing spray lotion called “ Living Steps.” Plaintiff furnished certain supplies and services to Bendyne Products, Inc., and on April 20, 1966, commenced…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Caesar v. BernardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Caesar v. . BernardNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Duberstein v. WernerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1966
- Trustees of Masonic Hall & Asylum Fund v. FontanaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
- Circulation Associates, Inc. v. Mother's Manual, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Camrex (Holdings) Ltd. v. Camrex Reliance Paint Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Feiwus v. Genpar, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- St. Johnland Nursing Home, Inc. v. Perlman, New York County Courts1987
- TJI Realty, Inc. v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Talbot Typographics, Inc. v. Tenba, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1990