Legal Opinion

Young v. Wilkinson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1858PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaRUTheks, J.

This is filed as a cross hill to that of Wilkinson as executor of Daniel Young deceased, for the administration of his' estate under the insolvent laws, against his creditors and legatees. The complainant is the widow of the deceased, who, after dissenting from the will of her husband, asserts her right to the 'twelve slaves derived from her father under his will, against the executor and creditors of said Daniel Young deceased who claim them as a part of his estate.

This is the state of facts upon which the question *162is made : Tazewell Hyde, the father of complainant, died in Davidson County…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Connecticut & Passumpsic Rivers Rail Road v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
  2. Estate of HindsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
  3. Gallego v. ChevallieU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1826
  4. Hartman v. DowdelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
  5. Tuttle v. FowlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Glos v. WoodardIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Giles v. KeunnenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. Cramer v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Citizens Trust Co. of Binghamton v. MerselisNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Dunlap v. PeirceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API