Legal Opinion

Freeman v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 2013No. 10-CO-414PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OBERLY, Associate Judge:

Seventeen years after he was convicted of first-degree murder and other armed offenses in connection with a road-rage *435incident, Gary Freeman’s convictions were vacated and re-entered to permit him to note an appeal because his trial counsel had failed to do so after Mr. Freeman was sentenced in 1993. Unfortunately, the trial transcripts from Mr. Freeman’s 1992 trial were no longer available when his motion for appointment of counsel was finally granted, and upon receipt of Mr. Freeman’s notice of appeal, this court remanded the case to the trial court to permit Mr.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Henry SelvaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Cole v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. United States v. Alvin Justin "Buddy" Huggins, United States of America v. Alvin Justin "Buddy" HugginsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  5. Egbuka v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eric Pasanisi and Tanganyika Wildlife Safari, Ltd. v. Mark Vanham and Klineburger Vanham International Hunting Consultants, LLC., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API