Legal Opinion
James Talcott, Inc. v. Burke
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 18, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 32849PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Weick, D. J.
This action is one on an account for merchandise sold and delivered in 1954. Jurisdiction of the court is based on diversity of citizenship.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is a New York corporation with its place of business in New York, N. Y.
The defendants are Sidney C. Burke and Nathan S. Anker, partners, doing business as Berwyck Sportswear, and Sidney C. Burke and Nathan S. Anker, individually.
The complaint alleges that Burke and Anker, residents of Cleveland, Ohio, operated here as a partnership, but are no longer in business and that the obligations set forth in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- State ex rel. Treasurer of State v. BowmanOhio Supreme Court · 1841
- Burgoyne v. Ohio Life Insurance & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1855
- Hadden v. SmallDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951
- President of Columbus v. HartOhio Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by5 opinions
- Champion Spark Plug Company v. KarchmarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Goldberg v. Wharf ConstructersDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1962
- De La Fuente Ex Rel. De La Fuente v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Carcella v. L & L Coach Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1984
- Powers v. Ohio State Racing CommissionClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 1989