Legal Opinion

Amy v. Carnival Corp.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided October 29, 2018No. Case No. 18-cv-20324-UUPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

URSULA UNGARO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. 47) (the "Motion").

THE COURT has considered the Motion, Plaintiff's Response in opposition to the Motion (D.E. 59) (the "Response"), Plaintiff's Statement of Disputed Material Facts in opposition to the Motion (D.E. 56) ("Plaintiff's Facts"), Defendant's Reply in support of the Motion (D.E. 61) (the "Reply"), and the pertinent portions of the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

For the reasons set forth below, Defendant's Motion is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Chaparro v. Carnival Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Michael A. Barfield v. David Brierton, Louis Carmichael, Richard Dugger, Thomas Barton, David E. Watson, Jerry C. Wade, Randall R. Music, John ShawCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Nancy Rojas v. State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holley v. Carnival CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API