Legal Opinion

Mendez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided March 29, 2001No. 11-99-00346-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, Justice.

Appellant pleaded guilty before a jury to murder, and the jury assessed his punishment at confinement for 99 years. We affirm.

Following three to four days of drinking and methamphetamine use, appellant shot the victim while she was at work at a convenience store. Appellant was apprehended at the scene. The victim was pronounced dead at the emergency room.

After it had admonished appellant and accepted his plea, the trial court instructed the jury to find appellant guilty of the offense of murder, a result oriented offense. Appellant testified during the punishment phase…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Ibarra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mendez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. Saunders v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2001
  4. Charles Hiawatha Montgomery v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  5. Maria Shuntay Hall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API