Legal Opinion

Busch v. Mcinnis Waste Sys., Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 18, 2018No. A164158PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P.J.

*236*821In this personal injury case, plaintiff asserts that the trial court violated the remedy clause in Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution, when it reduced his noneconomic damages award to $500,000 under ORS 31.710(1). Consistently with our decisions in Vasquez v. Double Press Mfg., Inc. , 288 Or. App. 503, 406 P.3d 225 (2017), rev. allowed , 362 Or. 665, 415 P.3d 580 (2018), and Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc. , 289 Or. App. 672, 410 P.3d 336 (2018), we conclude that the application of ORS 31.710(1) to plaintiff's jury award is unconstitutional. Accordingly, we reverse and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Greist v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Busch v. McInnis Waste Systems, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Dikes v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2018
  3. Moutal v. Exel, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API