Legal Opinion

Sweetser v. South Carolina Department of Insurance Reserve Fund

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 20, 2010No. 26905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Acting Chief Justice PLEICONES.

Appellant was injured when his employer’s vehicle in which he was riding as a passenger collided with a vehicle driven by an uninsured driver. Appellant has collected $13,520.21 in workers’ compensation benefits, and has a tort suit pending against the uninsured driver. Respondent issued an automobile liability policy to employer. It provides for $15,000 in uninsured motorist (UM) coverage, but also has an offset clause for compensation benefits. Fifteen thousand dollars is the minimum coverage under the UM statute. S.C.Code Ann. § 38-77-150 (2002).

Appellant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ferguson Ex Rel. Estate of Ferguson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CalcuttCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Antley v. Nobel InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JamesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Williamson v. United States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Siron v. Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
  2. Connelly v. The Main Street America GroupCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020
  3. Sibert v. State Automobile Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
  4. Snyder v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API