Legal Opinion
American Railway & Airway Supervisors Ass'n v. Soo Line Railroad
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 6, 1988No. Civ. 4-86-961PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are rail labor organizations that brought this action on behalf of their members against defendant Soo Line Railroad Company (Soo) under the Railway Labor Act (the Act or RLA), 45 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq. Plaintiffs seek to compel defendant to continue to participate in national employee benefit programs and to continue in national bargaining as to those programs. Jurisdiction is alleged pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 1337(a). Plaintiffs seek both declaratory and injunctive relief. Soo filed a counterclaim, asserting that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. United Transportation UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- The Delaware and Hudson Railway Company v. United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United Transportation Union v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- American Railway & Airway Supervisors Ass'n v. Soo Line RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- American Railway and Airway Supervisors Association, Division of Brac) v. Soo Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- AMERICAN RY. AND AIRWAY SUP'RS v. Soo Line R. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988