Legal Opinion

Abernathy v. Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROCK, Justice.

This is a declaratory judgment action brought by retired District Attorneys General to determine certain points of law respecting their retirement benefits. They are dissatisfied with the decree of the Chancellor and have appealed.

In 1953, the Attorneys General Retirement System was enacted by the legislature pursuant to T.C.A., §§ 8-618 through 8-622.1 Under that system, “benefit base” is defined as follows:

“ ‘Benefit base’ means a sum equal to the annual salary the retired attorney general would have received had he continued in the position from which he retired.”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miles v. Tennessee Consolidated Retirement SystemTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Weesner v. Electric Power Board of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961
  3. Felts v. Tennessee Consolidated Retirement SystemTennessee Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mathews v. BurkeensTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Moody v. State District Public Defenders ConferenceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  3. Moody v. State District Public Defenders ConferenceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API