Legal Opinion
Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1935No. L. A. No. 14973PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
On November 5, 1932, Vernon O. Peeples filed with the Industrial Accident Commission an application for compensation on account of injuries suffered while he was employed by the petitioner, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company, at Elgin, Nevada. The commission entered its decision and order on rehearing awarding compensation to the injured employee. The employer was self-insured, and in this proceeding to review the exercise of jurisdiction by the commission seeks to have the award annulled.
The applicant, Peeples, had previously been employed in California by the petitioner. The work…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. YurkonisSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. HelmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Pullman Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- McCoy v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- DeLong v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939