Legal Opinion
Burns v. Seymour
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 29, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
In this action for a declaratory judgment, the pertinent facts are the following: Pursuant to the provisions of § 298b of the 1951 Cumulative Supplement to the General Statutes (as amended, Cum. Sup. 1953, §732e), the towns of Barkhamsted, Colebrook, Hartland, Norfolk, Harwinton and New Hartford, during the summer of 1951, appointed members to a temporary regional school planning committee to investigate the advisability of constructing a regional high school. The members met on September 25, 1951, organized as the temporary regional school planning committee of the several towns and,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Kirby v. Board of Fire CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- McDonald v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- McPadden v. MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Ingle v. CaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Olszewski v. State Employees' Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Congress & Daggett, Inc. v. Seamless Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Barr v. First Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Levy v. HeymanConnecticut Superior Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.