Legal Opinion

Williams v. Ricca Et Ux. (Et Al.)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1936No. Appeal, 147PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Barnes,

The sole question presented for decision in this appeal is whether a writ of attachment execution issued under Section 35 of the Act of June 16,1836, P. L. 755, is effective to bind the contents of a safe deposit box rented by the judgment debtor. The proceeding before us originated in a judgment obtained on October 3, 1934, by Gordon Williams against Anthony Ricca and Arduina Ricca, his wife, upon a mortgage bond. Subsequently on November 15, 1934, the plaintiff caused a writ of. attachment execution to be issued, summoning as garnishee the Girard Trust Company,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Austin-Nichols & Co. v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Trainer v. SaundersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Reading Trust Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Conneautville Bank's Assigned EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Moon v. First Nat. Bank of BensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellenbogen v. PNC Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Seip Et Ux. v. LaubachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Mills v. JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Keystone State Corp. v. Union Indemnity Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1941
  5. Bair v. Newgeon, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API