Legal Opinion
Beverly Enterprises-Texas, Inc. v. Devine Convalescent Care Center
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 26, 2012No. 107,597. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARRY JOPLIN, Judge.
¶ 1 Plaintiff/Appellant, Beverly Enterprises, seeks review of the trial court's order granting the motion to dismiss of Defendants/Appellees, Devine Convalescent Care (or Devine) and Samuel Jewell. The trial court determined the Murray County, Oklahoma court lacked personal jurisdiction over Appellees and venue was improper in Murray County. The court transferred the matter to Medina County, Texas.
¶ 2 Appellant argues that Murray County, Oklahoma is the proper forum, the parties having sufficient minimum contacts with the state and Murray County particularly for the court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hunt Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Supreme Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- John Boutari and Son, Wines and Spirits, S.A. v. Attiki Importers and Distributors IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- TUCKER v. THE COCHRAN FIRM-CRIMINAL DEFENSE BIRMINGHAM L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- BURGGRAF SERVICES, INC. v. H2O SOLUTIONSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- BURGGRAF SERVICES, INC. v. H2O SOLUTIONSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- Balfour v. Carnival Cruise Lines IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021
- Chesapeake Operating LLC v. CC Forbes LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.