Post v. Alameda Amusement Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
In an action for damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained from a defective heater in a drive-in theater, the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant Alameda Amusment Company, a corporation, * and in favor of plaintiffs and against defendant National Heaters, Inc., † in the sum of $600. Prom the judgment entered thereon, plaintiffs appeal.
Questions Peesented
1. Were the verdicts inconsistent?
2. Were the verdicts compromise ones?
3. Alleged misconduct of Theater counsel.
Evidence
There was practically no conflict in the evidence, except as to the extent of plaintiff Mary’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pearl v. PearlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Lafargue v. United Railroad of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Nelson v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Donnatin v. Union Hardware & Metal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reynolds v. Natural Gas Equipment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Wood v. DavenportCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Whyatt v. KukuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958