Legal Opinion
Singh v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 25, 2011No. Nos. 06-74547, 07-71289PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
We consider whether lying to the immigration authorities is a sufficient basis for an adverse credibility finding, and when a lie uttered by one spouse may fairly be attributed to the other.
Facts
Nirmal Singh filed an asylum application soon after he came to the United States in 1994. He claimed that he had been persecuted in India because of his support for the Akali Dal Mann Party. Singh testified that he was arrested and severely beaten three times for his political activities, and that he believed the police murdered his brother for participating in a political…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jamal Ali Farah v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Juan Mendoza Manimbao v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- David Olusegun Akinmade v. Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Preet Kaur v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Singh v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011