Legal Opinion

Keith P. Sequeira et al. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 20, 2026No. 3:25-cv-01929Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY KEITH P. SEQUEIRA et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No, 25-1929 (RK) (JTQ) OW, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE MEMORANDUM OPINION COMPANY et al., Defendants. KIRSCH, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon pro se Plaintiffs Keith P. Sequeira and Helen D. Sequeira’s (“Plaintiffs”) First Amended Complaint. (“FAC,” ECF No. 12.) The Court must sua sponte screen Plaintiffs’ FAC pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DISMISSES the FAC with prejudice. L BACKGROUND A. PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API