Legal Opinion

State v. Weeks

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 18, 1993No. 91-284PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The principal issue in this appeal from a conviction

for sexual assault is whether allowing an expert witness to comment on the child victim’s credibility and to identify the perpetrator was plain error. We hold that it was and reverse and remand for a new trial.

I

After a bitter divorce, defendant and his ex-wife continued to struggle over his visitation with their daughter and only child. When the child resisted the visits and defendant insisted on them, the mother, on advice of counsel, sought out a psychologist, Dr. Cunningham, to determine whether the child had been sexually abused. Dr.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. CatsamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  4. State v. BubarSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  5. State v. PercySupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. KinneySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  2. State v. KubikNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. FisherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. State v. LovelandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  5. State v. WiggSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API