Legal Opinion

Peters v. Gelb

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 1, 1973PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Judge.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, sued defendants for damages' resulting from an unsuccessful vasectomy operation performed by defendants on husband.

At the trial defendants testified to the surgical procedure which they followed. A urological surgeon who practices in Wilmington, Delaware testified that the surgical procedure described by defendants was the accepted procedure. He further testified that recent medical literature disclosed that in a small percentage of such operations a physiological phenomenon known as recanalization occurs.

A physician presently residing in New…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pederson v. DumouchelWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Brune v. BelinkoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  3. Douglas v. BussabargerWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Di Filippo v. PrestonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  5. Carbone v. WarburtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Coleman v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
  2. Dutton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. Hurtt v. GoleburnSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  4. Gambill v. StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  5. Coleman v. GarrisonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API