Legal Opinion

(PC) Jorgenson v. United States of America

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 24, 2019No. 1:17-cv-00817Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PAUL JORGENSON, Case No. 1:17-cv-00817-LJO-EPG (PC) 8 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 9 RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT v. HAAK’S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS 10 BE DENIED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA., et al., 11 (ECF NO. 46) Defendants. 12 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS 13 14 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 Paul Jorgenson (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 17 pauperis in this action. This case now proceeds on Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint 18 (“SAC”), which was filed on July 12,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API