Scott v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)
1Per curiam
A jury convicted Appellant of the offense of murder and assessed punishment at life imprisonment. Appellant raises one point of error on appeal. We will affirm.
By his sole point of error, Appellant alleges that the trial court erred in admitting, as a dying declaration, the victim Bobby McDonald’s statement identifying Appellant as the person who shot him. Under Tex. R.CRIM.Evid. 804(b)(2) (Vernon 1992), a dying declaration is admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule. Rule 804(b)(2) provides:(b) Hearsay exceptions. The following are not excluded if the declarant is unavailable as a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Pritchett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Rushing v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Hayes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Adam Alonzo Naranjo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- Ferrell Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2009
- Ferrell Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2009
- Gardner, John StevenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Gardner, John StevenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.