Legal Opinion
State v. Mobile O. R. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 15, 1934No. 3 Div. 94PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The Mobile & Ohio Railroad Company, by its receivers, appointed by the United States District Court, whose jurisdiction is not questioned, undertook, by this proceeding, to have the benefit of section 73 of the Revenue Act of 1927 (Gen. Acts 1927, p. 185), in which it is provided that the owner of any property which is by law required to be assessed by the state tax commission, may appeal from said final assessment made by the said tax commission to the circuit court of Montgomery county, sitting in equity. The method of so doing is there provided and that method was pursued…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Marshall v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Cullman Property Co. v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Tidwell v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Northern Finance Corporation v. ByrnesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Roubicek v. RoubicekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- State v. Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Berman v. Wreck-A-Pair Bldg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Thurlow v. BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- State v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.