Legal Opinion
In Re Napp Technologies, Inc. Litigation
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 4, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
768 A.2d 274 (2000)
338 N.J. Super. 176
In re NAPP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. LITIGATION
Application Of Holt & Ross, Inc. To Quash Subpoena.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County.
Decided October 4, 2000.
Louis Pashman, Hackensack, of Pashman Stein appearing on behalf of a non-party witness Holt & Ross, Inc.
Martis Ann Brachtl, New York City, of Goodkind, Labaton, Rudoff & Sucharow, LLP; and Mark S. Shane, Esq., appearing on behalf of plaintiffs Katharine Christiano, et al.
Michael Dore, and Rosemary E. Ramsey, of Lowenstein Sandler, appearing on behalf defendant-third party plaintiff…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. BarowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- D.C. v. R.R.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Too Much Media, LLC v. HaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Too Much Media, LLC v. HaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- In re January 11, 2013 Subpoena by the Grand JuryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- In re Long Branch Manufactured Gas PlantNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005