Frischling v. Priest Oil and Gas Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
This cause comes before this court on defendant First National Bank of Birmingham’s (hereinafter FNB) motion to dismiss for improper venue. This decision that defendant, FNB, must be dismissed for lack of venue in this district makes it unnecessary to consider FNB’s motion for a protective order.
The venue provisions of the National Banking Act, 12 U.S.C. § 94, provide that a National Bank may only be sued in the district in which it is established. It is unanimously recognized that a bank is “established” only in the federal district that encompasses the place…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. NaftalinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Denny v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Caliber Partners, Ltd. v. AffeldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- North American Financial Group, Ltd. v. S.M.R. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Bianco v. Texas Instruments, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Arroyo v. WheatDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1984
- In Re HaasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.