The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc., Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Cambridge Wire Cloth Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BISSELL, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, finding U.S. Patent Nos. 4,159,763 (’763), 3,870,141 (’141), 4,051,949 (’949) and Re. 30,341 (’341) owned by Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc. (collectively called Laitram) valid and infringed by products produced by Cambridge Wire Cloth Company (CWC). The magistrate’s opinion is reported at 226 USPQ 289 (D.Md.1985). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
BACKGROUND
Laitram asserted at the trial that the four patents mentioned above were infringed by CWC’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Atlas Powder Company v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company and Alamo Explosives Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- J.P. Stevens & Co. v. Lex Tex Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kloster Speedsteel AB v. Crucible Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc. v. Cambridge Wire Cloth CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Cargill, Inc. v. Canbra Foods, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Fmc Corporation and Vulcan Equipment Company, Ltd. v. Hennessy Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Kloster Speedsteel Ab v. Crucible Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.