Legal Opinion

State v. Scott M.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1999No. Court of Appeals Nos. E-98-065, E-98-066. Trial Court Nos. 98CO000023, 98CO000024PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Handwork, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, which, after denying his motion to suppress, found appellant, Scott M., guilty of two counts of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. For the reasons stated herein, this court reverses the judgment of the trial court.

Appellant sets forth the following four assignments of error:

“1. The trial court erred by ruling that exigent circumstances existed at the time of the warrantless entry of defendant/appellant’s apartment.
“2. The trial court erred by failing to suppress…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HooverOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. NamayCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2000
  3. Thorne v. Steubenville Police OfficerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
  4. State v. Riley, 22517 (6-13-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Wauseon v. LeveckOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API