Jerome Milian v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
Jerome Milian (“Milian”) appeals the trial court’s denial of his pro se motion to withdraw his guilty plea contending that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing him to proceed pro se in arguing the motion and denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Milian pleaded guilty to dealing in cocaine 1 as a Class A felony and to his status as an habitual substance offender. 2 The factual basis supporting his guilty plea establishes the following: On July 16, 2012, Milian was arrested by police officers after the completion…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tumulty v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Brightman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Coomer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cody Mikework v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Frank James v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Joseph Dale Lewis v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Matthew S. Simons v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018