Legal Opinion

City of Sand Springs v. Gray

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 1938No. 27521PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This action was begun by Eunice Gray, defendant in error, in the district court of Tulsa county, against the Monarch Cement Company, a private corporation, and the city of Sand Springs. Okla., a municipal corporation, plaintiff ir error, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained from the negligent operation of the defendant city’s fire truck. Hereafter the parties will be designated as they appeared in the trial court.

The petition alleged that the Monarcli • Cement Company caused the gaud Springs fire department to respond to a call to the plant, outside the city limits. Returning…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. City of Shawnee v. RoushSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Cummings v. LobsitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Oklahoma City v. HaggardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. City of Okmulgee v. CarltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HoustonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Brasier v. CribbettNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hartman v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Shearer, Adm'x v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Ex Parte HoustonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API