Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 11, 2012No. 99,163PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Biles, J.:

Michael Mitchell was convicted of aggravated robbery based entirely on the victim’s eyewitness identification. The victim picked Mitchell out of a photo lineup a few days after the robbeiy and indicated 100 percent certainty that Mitchell was the assailant. At trial, the victim testified he had known Mitchell for several months before the attack but did not know his name.

On appeal, Mitchell argues the district court should have deleted the degree of certainty factor from those listed in PIK Crim. 3d 52.20, which is the cautionaiy eyewitness…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Perry v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. SánchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. State v. LowerySupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  4. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. ToddSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API