Legal Opinion

State v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 27, 2012No. 101,641PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

John Steven Marshall was convicted by a juiy of burglary of a nonresidence, criminal damage to property, and obstruction of a legal duty. The strongest evidence against Marshall was an eyewitness’ identification of Marshall as the burglar. On appeal Marshall raises two issues related to the eyewitness’ identification.

First, Marshall argues the prosecutor committed misconduct during closing argument by vouching for the eyewitness’ credibility. In response, the State argues the prosecutor’s comments were in response to defense counsel’s…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Perry v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. State v. PabstSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. State v. ToshSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. State v. ReidSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. State v. BridgesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. State v. HiltSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. State v. StaffordSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API