Legal Opinion

Virgil v. Dretke

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 18, 2006No. 03-21129PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

We confront here a situation in which two persons, both expressly stating an inability to serve as fair and impartial jurors, found their way onto the jury that convicted Frank Virgil and sentenced him to thir ty years in prison. Virgil, now seeking a writ of habeas corpus, contends that counsel’s failure to challenge for cause these two jurors deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel. We agree and hold that the state court’s decision to the contrary was an unreasonable application of clearly established Federal law as…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. United States v. WithersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Richards v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  3. People v. ManningIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Harvey v. Warden, Union Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. LaChanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API