Legal Opinion

Qualls v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1998No. 30956PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Steven Qualls appeals from a judgment of conviction of principal to attempted murder with the use of a deadly weapon. We conclude that the district court’s admission of other bad act evidence without conducting a Petrocelli 1 hearing and without instructing the jury on the limited use of the evidence amounted to harmless error. Therefore, we affirm the conviction.

FACTS

On December 18, 1996, shots were fired into an occupied residence in Elko, Nevada. At trial, the State’s theory of the case was that Qualls and his co-defendant attempted to kill a young female because of her association…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Petrocelli v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Kazalyn v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Tinch v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Wesley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lay v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by28 opinions

  1. Byford v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Carter v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Butler v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Braunstein v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  5. McNelton v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API