Tinch v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant Sharmarlo Tinch was convicted of first degree murder with the use of a deadly weapon and conspiracy to commit murder, both with gang enhancements, for the drive-by shooting and murder of a rival gang member. Tinch appeals his conviction on the grounds that a mistrial should have been granted because one juror allegedly told the bailiff, prior to being polled, that she wished to change her verdict to not guilty and because the State violated the rules of discovery. Tinch further asserts that evidence of his prior bad acts was erroneously introduced at trial.
FACTS
Omar Walls…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Doyle v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- Pinana v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1960
- Lay v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Lopez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Berner v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by63 opinions
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Evans v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Chavez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Middleton v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Rosky v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.