Legal Opinion

Tinch v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1997No. 28064PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Sharmarlo Tinch was convicted of first degree murder with the use of a deadly weapon and conspiracy to commit murder, both with gang enhancements, for the drive-by shooting and murder of a rival gang member. Tinch appeals his conviction on the grounds that a mistrial should have been granted because one juror allegedly told the bailiff, prior to being polled, that she wished to change her verdict to not guilty and because the State violated the rules of discovery. Tinch further asserts that evidence of his prior bad acts was erroneously introduced at trial.

FACTS

Omar Walls…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Doyle v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Pinana v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Lay v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Lopez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Berner v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by63 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Evans v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Chavez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Middleton v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Rosky v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API