Legal Opinion
Concelman v. Ray
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided June 17, 1975No. 74-474PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
538 P.2d 1343 (1975)
Claude W. CONCELMAN and Mildred B. Concelman, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Ruth RAY, formerly known as Ruth Trostel, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 74-474.
Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.
June 17, 1975.
Rehearing Denied July 8, 1975.
Certiorari Denied September 2, 1975.
Hayden, Ross & Sweeney, William G. Ross, Lakewood, for plaintiffs-appellees.
Lewis E. Eagan, Charles P. Miller, James J. Scott, Aurora, for defendant-appellant.
Selected for Official Publication.
PIERCE, Judge.
On our own motion we have raised the issue of whether we have jurisdiction to hear this appeal. Having afforded…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Service Oil Co. v. RhodusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Swan v. ZwahlenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Chapman v. MillerColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
- Federal Lumber Co. v. HanleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- SMLL, L.L.C. v. DalyColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Broderick v. McElroy and McCoy, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Dill v. COUNTY COURT IN & FOR CITY & CTY. OF DENVERColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
- Broderick v. McElroy and McCoy, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998