Legal Opinion

Broderick v. McElroy and McCoy, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1998No. 96CA0712PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge NEY.

Defendants, Ray Dixon, McElroy and McCoy, Inc., d/b/a Prudential-McElroy McCoy Brokers, Inc., and Prudential Prime Properties, Inc., (brokers) appeal the trial court’s award of attorney fees and certain costs against brokers in favor of James M. and Karen D. Broderick (sellers) on their claim of breach of fiduciary duty. Brokers also appeal the trial court’s award of actual damages, attorney fees, and costs against brokers jointly and severally with co-defendants William and Karen Eberhart (buyers) (who are not parties to this appeal). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cherry Creek School District 5 v. Voelker Ex Rel. VoelkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Bunnett v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1989
  4. Dewey v. HardyColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Mitten v. WestonColorado Court of Appeals · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fericks v. Lucy Ann Soffe TrustUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People Ex Rel. AeColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. In Re the Marriage of BuckColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Filho v. RodriguezColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Emerson v. Wembley USA Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API