Artis v. Keegan
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge L. Cobb, J.
In this proceeding, the petitioner seeks a judgment in the nature of mandamus compelling the respondents to accept for filing an accusatory instrument which charges that one identified police officer and two unidentified police officers assaulted the petitioner. The petitioner alleges that on two particular occasions the respondents have refused and neglected to accept the said instrument for filing and the petitioner now seeks the aid of this court in compelling the performance of what the petitioner says is the legal duty of the respondents.
A judgment in the nature of mandamus is available…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maynard v. ShankerNew York City Family Court · 1969
- People Ex Rel. Oaklawn Corp. v. . DoneganNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- People ex rel. Lindgren v. McGuireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- People ex rel. Jaffe v. BolteNew York Supreme Court · 1901
- Koslow v. MorrisonNew York Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sackinger v. NevinsNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. VladikNassau County District Court · 1989
- Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. ScheinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1979