Legal Opinion

Davison v. Davison

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Clare. (Daboll, J., presiding.) Attachment under log-lien law. Defendant log-owner brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This is a suit in attachment to enforce a *626lien upon logs for work and labor under Act No. 229, Laws of 1887. • The defendant Jackson, as the owner of the logs, appeared specially before the justice, and moved to quash the writ for several reasons, only one of which it is important to notice, as it is fatal to plaintiffs case. The return of the officer failed to show that a copy of the inventory of the property seized was served upon the principal defendants or upon the owner of the logs, and no reason is shown for failure to make service. Attachment proceedings are purely statutory, and must…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Langtry v. Wayne Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hoben v. Citizens' Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Rameau v. ValleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Reynolds v. Marquette Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Wells v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Tacoma v. NyenhuisMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API