Wells v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of Baltimore
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Hillsdale; Chester, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Russell O. Wells against the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company of Baltimore, Maryland, on an indemnity bond. .There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant took a special appeal to the circuit court. A judgment for defendant is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This is an action of assumpsit brought by plaintiff, a resident of Hillsdale county, against the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company of Baltimore, Maryland, a foreign corporation. The suit originated in justice’s court by summons dated December 16, 1907, and returnable December 28, 1907. The service was had upon the defendant by sending the original summons and two copies thereof, by mail, to the commissioner of insurance, and upon the original summons that officer made the following return:. “ I hereby certify that I received through the mail December 19, 1907, two copies of the within…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. EstillSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Showen v. J. L. Owens Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- E. S. Knowles & Son v. CavanaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Davison v. DavisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hoben v. Citizens' Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Atchison, T. & S. F. RY. CO. v. DraytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Tacoma v. NyenhuisMichigan Supreme Court · 1916