Beckman v. Alaska Dredging Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.
This is an action against the Alaska Dredging Company and others on a number of promissory notes. To the second amended complaint, the Alaska Dredging Company interposed a demurrer on the grounds that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, or any cause of action, against the demurrant; and that it affirmatively appears in the second amended complaint that the action was not commenced within the time limited by law.
“Actions can only be commenced within the periods herein prescribed after the cause of action shall have accrued . . . The period prescribed in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hogan v. KurtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Griffin v. LearWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- McAuliff v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Bank of Montreal v. GuseWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Liberman v. GurenskyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pedersen v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- In the Matter of the Marriage of: Mary Alice Carlson & Hugh David CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Pedersen v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986